Influence of a surface modification of natural clay components soil on the desorption of cesium

TitleInfluence of a surface modification of natural clay components soil on the desorption of cesium
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsKobets, SA, Fedorova, VM, Pshinko, GN, Goncharuk, VV
Abbreviated Key TitleDopov. Nac. akad. nauk Ukr.
DOI10.15407/dopovidi2015.11.082
Issue11
SectionChemistry
Pagination82-90
Date Published11/2015
LanguageRussian
Abstract

The cesium desorption from model-based samples of montmorillonite from the Cherkassy deposit is studied. On their surface, humic acids or hydroxides of Fe(III) are deposited by ammonium salts, which are placed by its leaching capacity in a row: NH4Cl < NH4H2Cit < (NH4)2Ox < (NH4)2HCit. The most effective and environmentally viable in the neutral pH range as leaching reagents for cesium ions are 0.1 M/l solutions of disubstituted disodium citrate ammonium salts.
Keywordscesium, desorption, humic acid, iron(III) hydroxide, montmorillonite
References: 
  1. Prister B. S., Kluchnikov A. A., Shestopalov V. M., Kuhar V. P. Problems of nuclear power safety. The lessons of Chernobyl, Chernobyl: Inst. problems NPP safety, 2013 (in Russian).
  2. Sobotovich E. V., Bondarenko G. N., Olkhovik Yu. A. Radiochemistry in the zone of Chernobyl, Kyiv: Nauk. Dumka, 1992 (in Russian).
  3. Shevchenko O. L., Kozitskiy O. M., Nasedkin I. Yu., Ryabtseva G. P., Bublias V. N., Ivanushkina N. I., Osadcha N. M., Pereheida V. V., Sizonenko V. P., Shestopalov V. M. Patterns of relationship of migration of man-caused radionuclides on reclamation work of Chernobyl radioactive contamination zone on results researches 1986–2004, Kherson: Oldi-Plus, 2011 (in Ukrainian).
  4. Batiy V. G., Paskevich S. A., Rudko V. M., Sizov A. A., Shcherbin V. N. Probl. atomic sci. and technol., 2004, No 5: 96–100.
  5. Cornell R. M. J. Radioanal. and Nucl. Chem., 1993, 171: 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02219872
  6. Kornilovich B.Yu., Pshynko H. N., Spasenova L. N. Radiochem., 2000, 42, No 1: 92–96 (in Russian).
  7. Honcharuk V. V., Pshynko H. N. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr., 2011, No 10: 3–17 (in Ukrainian).
  8. Bondarenko G. N., Kononenko L. V., Kolyabina I. L. Kinetics of radionuclide speciation in soil as a key factor in forecasting of ecological state of the environment, Kyiv: Nauk. dumka, 2014 (in Russian).
  9. Bondareva L. G., Bolsunovskii A.Ya. Radiochem., 2008, 50, No 5: 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1066362208050196
  10. Davydov Yu. P., Voronik N. I., Shatilo N. N., Davydov D.Yu. Radiochem., 2002, 44, No 3: 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020323227344
  11. Ivashkevich L. S., Bondar' Yu. I. Radiochem., 2008, 50, No 1: 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1066362208010165
  12. Pshinko G. N., Bogolepov A. A., Kobets S. A., Kosorukov A. A. Radiochem., 2009, 51, No 2: 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1066362209020210
  13. Kobets S. A., Fedorova V. M., Pshinko G. N., Kosorukov A. A., Demchenko V.Ya. Radiochem., 2014, 56, No 3: 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1066362214030175
  14. Wolff-Boenisch D., Traina S. J. Chem. Geol., 2007, 243: 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.06.013
  15. Kobets S. A., Pshinko G. N., Bogolepov A. A. Radiochem., 2009, 51, No 4: 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1066362209040092