Adsorption of methane on the hydrophobic surface of methyl silica in isobaric conditions




methane, adsorption, hydration, hydrophobic silica, methane hydrates


Low-temperature 1H NMR spectroscopy was used to study the adsorption of methane on a surface of hydrated hydrophobic silica AM-1-300. It is shown that the adsorption value depends strongly on the hydration and pretreatment of samples. The maximum adsorption of methane (up to 80 mg/g) is observed for a sample rehydrated (h = 0.2 g/g) after complete drying. It is found that methane adsorption is determined by several bound water clusters of R < 2 nm in radius. Based on the shape of the temperature dependence of the methane adsorption, it is assumed that there is both physical adsorption and the formation of solid methane hydrates.


Download data is not yet available.


Holbrook, W. S., Hoskins, H., Wood, W. T., Stephen, R. A. & Lizarralde, D. (1996). Methane hydrate and free gas on the Blake Ridge from vertical seismic profiling. Science, 273, pp. 1840-1843.

Collett, T. S., Lee, M. W., Agena, W. F., Miller, J. J., Lewis, K. A., Zyrianova, M. V., Boswell, R. & Inks, T. L. (2011). Permafrost-associated natural gas hydrate occurrences on the Alaska North Slope. Mar. Pet. Geol., 28, pp. 279-294.

Krey, V., Canadell, J. G., Nakicenovic, N., Abe, Yu., Andruleit, H., Archer, D., Grubler, A., Hamilton, N. T. M., Johnson, A., Kostov, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Langhorne, N., Nisbet, E. G., O’Neill, B., Riahi, K., Riedel, M., Wang,

W. & Yakushev, V. (2009). Gas hydrates: Entrance to a methane age or climate threat. Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 034007.

Turov, V. V. & Gun’ko, V. M. (2011). Clustered water and ways of its use. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka (in Russian).

Gregg, S. J. & Sing, K. S. W. (1982). Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.

Derome, E. (1992). Modern NMR methods for chemical research. Moscow: Mir (in Russian).

Gun’ko, V. M., Turov, V. V. & Krupska, T. V. (2018). Interfacial behavior of methane and organic solvents with low freezing points upon interaction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanosilicas. Himia, Fizika ta Tehnologia Poverhni, 9, No. 2, pp. 107-123.

Gun’ko, V. M., Turov, V. V., Krupska, T. V. & Pakhlov, E. M. (2017). Behavior of water and methane bound to hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanosilicas and their mixture. Chem. Phys. Lett., 690, pp. 25-30.

Gun’ko, V. M., Turov, V. V., Pakhlov, E. M., Krupska, T. V., Borysenko, M. V., Kartel, M. T. & Charmas, B. (2018). Water interactions with hydrophobic versus hydrophilic nanosilica. Langmuir, 34, No. 40, pp. 12145- 12153.

Pat. 138023 UA, IPC G01N13/00, G01N15/00, Method of transferring a mixture of hydrophilic and hydrophobic silica into an aqueous medium by using high mechanical loads, Krupskaya, T.V., Turov, V.V., Gunko, V.M. & Kartel, M.T., Publ. 11.11.2019 (in Ukrainian).

Gun’ko, V. M. & Turov, V. V. (2013). Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of interfacial phenomena. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Gun’ko, V. M., Turov, V. V., Pakhlov, E. M., Matkovsky, A. K., Krupska, T. V., Kartel, M. T. & Charmas, B. (2018). Blends of amorphous/crystalline nanoalumina and hydrophobic amorphous nanosilica. J. Non-Cryst. Solid., 500, pp. 351-358.

Aksnes, D. W., Førland, K. & Kimtys, L. (2001). Pore size distribution in mesoporous materials as studied by

H NMR. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 3, pp. 3203-3207.

Petrov, O. V. & Furó I. (2009). NMR cryoporometry: Principles, applications and potential. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 54, pp. 97-122.



How to Cite

Turov В. ., Gunko В. ., & Krupskaya Т. . (2023). Adsorption of methane on the hydrophobic surface of methyl silica in isobaric conditions. Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (2), 83–92.